Be patient, friends. You’ll have to read the whole story to get to the really juicy part.
You may have seen a so-called response last week in the Press Herald, by a TRNE groupie, to our Maine Voices column of 12 November, posted here: http://othersideofbrunswick.blogspot.com/2015/11/pph-maine-voices-rerouting-downeaster.html
We just posted this response, a few days later than we would have liked, but getting over the nausea caused by Menair’s words took longer than expected. Here it is:
=======================================================================
I authored the November 12th Maine Voices Mr. Menair is responding to in his essay of December 9th. Further, he was in attendance when I briefed the Passenger Rail Advisory Committee in Augusta (http://www.scribd.com/doc/284589130/PRAC-PDF-Briefing-13-October-15) Much of his second paragraph is clearly aimed at myself and my colleagues, who have become the first spirited opposition to Maine's passenger rail advocates. If you look into things, you'll quickly realize that all Menair has is airy platitudes to make his case, because the facts on the ground do not support his position.
Menair's offering is so full of fantasies and claptrap that I hardly know where to begin in responding. If nothing else, he makes it clear why modern day passenger rail advocates like he, TrainRiders Northeast (TRNE), All Aboard Brunswick and the rest are increasingly referred to as 'foamers' nationally and in Augusta. But I've got to begin somewhere. So in no particular order, here are comments of the moment:
-
Anyone who wants to hammer us with the term 'urban planning' here in Maine
immediately disqualifies himself. Urban is best translated as 'citified,' and
with the possible exception of Portland, I'm not aware of any city or region in
Maine that wants to be labeled as 'citified.' People don't move to Maine or
remain in Maine to have a citified lifestyle. If that's what Menair and his
friends want, they should move (back) to Boston, New York, Chicago,
Philadelphia, Washington, or wherever else they came from or aspire to.
Brunswick for one has a large contingent of retired bureaucrats and related
career types who moved here for the rural life style Maine offers. Stop trying
to project your old lifestyle, or your vision of big city 'benefits' on a state
that wants exactly the opposite, and isn't in the least adaptable to such
'planning.' If you want three times an hour traffic reports 'from the sky' on
your radio or TV, go find them elsewhere; there are more choices than you might
know.
-
Putting the interests of less than 40 round trip riders who choose the
Brunswick Downeaster runs daily, and 400 or so Mainers overall, ahead of
hundreds of thousands of local residents who don't, isn't putting 'people before
cars.'
-
Oil prices influencing the trade-off? The Downeaster budgets $10,000 a day
for diesel fuel, of which much is burned sitting and idling, going nowhere.
World oil markets have the potential to seriously effect it's operation
accordingly, since this accounts for 15% of operating expenses.
-
If “urban planning” means federal authorities steam-rolling over Municipal
Zoning Regulations due to pre-emption, we should want no part of it. If forward
progress means federal and state authorities trampling over the domestic
tranquility of hundreds of families, while being exempted from environmental
regs they instituted, then we have lost our collective sense of behaving
responsibly.
-
Since TRNE is one of the charities to which NNEPRA regularly donates, we
should expect no less in the way of advocacy from Menair and them. Recently,
their Chairman, Wayne Davis, told a reporter that the Brunswick 'business
community' donated $50,000 to them to help pay for 'legal fees.' We'd sure like
to know which businesses that would be, since we can't think of any besides
Brunswick Taxi that are prospering because of the Brunswick Downeaster service,
transporting Amtrak crews back and forth between Brunswick and Portland twice a
day.
- Menair's reference to Brunswick Station is hollow. Take the medical offices away, which have nothing to do with the train, and you have nothing left but a bank and a few other small businesses that have nothing to do with train travelers. Unless you believe people take the train to Brunswick for Guinness and a burger, or to get hearing aids. "The Inn" is a gift to Bowdoin; and the other structures simply took advantage of land lying unused for years, that could have been developed in other forms with the same encouraging “gifts” from beleaguered town taxpayers. The planned housing is a distant memory no one brings up.
-
One of the comments to Menair's piece praises him for summarizing 'the very
strong reasons justifying this action well,' and describes the 'benefit for the
many, and the environment, that will result from the layover facility.' That
doesn't pass the most rudimentary smell test, even with the help of a
clothespin. Passenger rail is first and foremost a clear cut case of the many
paying for a boutique service for the few in the carriage set, and in the case
of the Downeaster, is certifiably a detriment to the environment. The reference
to living near the railroad is also bogus, since long established zoning regs
would not allow this heavy industrial use or a building of this size. But when
the government comes to help us, such details are irrelevant.
-
As a friend remarked, “the rebuttal to this nonsense is to imagine Maine
without the Downeaster and nothing but roads to get around. How does that work?
Now, imagine Maine with no roads, but trains going everywhere. How would that be
an improvement? Trains or no trains, Maine's future and America's future has
cars (or some other form of PERSONAL mobility) and roads in it.”
- Another friend added “When is a train like a ship? Answer: When its capacity far exceeds its market demand and the excessive cost of providing service results in unjustifiable and intolerable financial losses. The Portland-Halifax “Nova Star” is the marine equivalent of the Portland-Brunswick ”Downeaster” (two years and $41-million of losses, albeit shared by the cruise operator).”
That last one seems perfectly matched to Menair and TRNE. But you might prefer this headline from a recent print article in another state: “Tomorrow's dollars to pay for yesterday's ideas.”
As a last point, if Menair and TRNE believe the Brunswick service and the Brunswick MLF are so vital, why was Wayne Davis heard saying recently “I wish we had never brought the train to Brunswick?” Or was it “I wish I HAD NEVER....” which would be more in keeping with his and TRNE's self-anointed role as NNEPRA's creator and Svengali.
================================================================
We can guess at why he wishes so: because the train and the MLF are a dumb-ass idea? Or is it because it’s given us a glimpse of what lies down the Downeaster rabbit-hole of Patsy in Wonderland? And opened up a Pandora’s box of scrutiny, analysis, and visibility behind the cheery facade, including an OPEGA audit?
Which leads to the following questions: When NNEPRA announces that the Brunswick MLF will be named the “Wayne Davis Memorial Passenger Rail Layover Facility,” will said Svengali decline the honor? And does NNEPRA still plan on adding Sleeper cars to every Downeaster train set?
Come to think of it; given all the empty seats and time spent going nowhere, perhaps the train could be used to provide a warm place to sleep for the homeless of our state when space is available.
And that’s the news from Wayne’s World. Party on, Garth. (The photo above is from an earlier faze in Wayne’s career; his countenance has changed markedly, as has that of his blonde friend.)
No comments:
Post a Comment