Monday, January 27, 2014

The Maine Wire: Tooth Fairy Government

toothfairy

This item just got published on The Maine Wire.

It uses the Town of Brunswick to illustrate a tangible means of comprehending the costs of major entitlement programs.  You’ll have to read the entire item to get the full effect, but we’ll whet your appetite with these two contrasting passages:

For illustration, let’s look at two typical Brunswick residential taxpayers: Chris, whose home is appraised at $140,000, and Pat, whose home is appraised at $280,000, both after any applicable exemptions.  This year, Chris is paying $3,716 in annual property taxes, and Pat is paying $7,432.  This equates to roughly $71.50 and $143 per week respectively.  Or $310 and $620 monthly to their impound accounts. (- See more at: http://www.themainewire.com/2014/01/tooth-fairy-government-bringing-medicaid-expansion-town/#sthash.MbOio1i8.dpuf)

This is before factoring in the full cost of Medicaid if it were paid for through our property taxes:

We’d now need to collect $101.2 million annually in property taxes, nearly triple what we currently take in.  The mil rate would increase to 75.45.  Chris would be paying $10,562 in yearly property taxes, and Pat would be chipping in to the tune of $21,126.  We hope they’re disciplined enough to set aside the $203 and $406 weekly this would require.  (Or the $880 and $1760 monthly their impound accounts would demand, respectively.)

We hope you’ll give the column a full reading.  We can’t wait to hear your response.

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Not to be outdone by the BDA, the other BDA announces first Annual Award….

                  

The Brunswick DownSide Association, at it’s first ever annual gathering, announced that it has created an award for exemplary monetary generosity to solicitous communities.  Named the Burning Backside Award, LT Ben Dover, speaking on behalf of the founder, made this statement in announcing the first recipient:

“The first ever Burning Backside Award presented by The Brunswick DownSide Association honors Patsy Blaze-Spinn, Executive Director of the Northern New England Currency Combustion Authority (NNECCA).  Ms. Spinn has rekindled local interest in long-ignored alternative energy sources, and ignited a firestorm of excitement about the transition to a new heating system for the McClellan Building.”

“Unimpressed by the current electrical heating system,” he continued, “which reportedly runs bills in the $100,000 a year range, Ms. Spinn personally obtained an initial trainload of currency from state and federal OPM accounts to replace the electric unit with a certified currency cremator.  She and her staff are now working with the Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Railroad Administration to schedule regular rail shipments of pelletized currency.  Thanks to Ms. Spinn’s leadership of NNECCA, McClellan homefires  will keep burning, and town officials can be assured of a warm fuzzy feeling.  As an added benefit, the pelletized currency shipments will ensure that Amtrak rail service to Brunswick continues in perpetuity.”

In accepting the award, Blaze-Spinn said “this award would not have been possible without the willing due-negligence and submissiveness of numerous town staff and officials, and they should share this award with me.  We’re all proud to be part of a team that is setting the economy on fire here in Brunswick.  Through this pioneering effort, we’ve ensured that Brunswick will have a ready source of draw down fuel resources for the foreseeable future, none of which will cost any of us anything.”

OK; you caught us.  We’re in one of our frivolous frames of mind; it’s the curse of a ‘fertile’ imagination.  We need to have a little fun every now and then.  Especially this time of year, when temperatures barely make it to the teen-aged level, and we look for chances to joke around.

The inspiration for our silliness is this recent release from the Brunswick Downtown Association (edited down):

Brunswick, ME 1.23.14– The Brunswick Downtown Association BDA) hosted our 2014 Annual Meeting on January 23rd at the

Inn at Brunswick Station. BDA Board Chair, Dee Perry opened the breakfast meeting by thanking the generous donors to the BDA, thanking outgoing Board members welcoming new Board members.

Dee also recognized several Brunswick businesses a BDA volunteer and the Town Manager for their dedication to the BDA and the town of Brunswick. These accolades included:

  • Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA) was recognized as BUSINESS MEMBER OF THE YEAR for increasing the accessibility of the town to visitors and residents. The Brunswick and Freeport ridership has far exceeded what was predicted. Patricia Quinn, executive director of NNEPRA, accepted the award.
  • A tribute to outgoing Town Manager Gary Brown, acknowledged his long standing support of the BDA and his role in the development of Station Avenue and the New Brunswick Police Station. Gary was given a print of Brunswick Station created by Karl Saila as recognition.

Here’s the way we see things vis-à-vis these awards.  Amtrak passenger rail service, with a minor exception or two, is financially non-viable and unsustainable without massive federal injection of funds this nation does not have.  Doweaster service to Brunswick, we further believe, has cost the town and the state funds that will never be returned in any conventional investment form. 

In other words, Amtrak and the Downeaster are burning other peoples’ money (OPM) by the carload, and will continue to do so until economic collapse.  But we suppose it’s nice if you can win awards from the local beneficiaries for burning up the funds on their behalf.

Additionally, we can’t help but chuckle over the tribute to the resigning Mr. Manager who ‘wasn’t asked to resign.’ 

But he wasn’t asked to re-sign, either, was he?  And  he’s getting quite a cash ‘tribute’ for not doing so.  Reminds us, in a way, of being in the taxi business.  Leave office, collect cash.

Funny how these things work, isn’t it?  That’s what we thought too.

So we decided to ‘burn off’ a little excess silliness by being a joker.

Technorati Tags: ,

Saturday, January 25, 2014

“Mr. Manager,” “New Directions,” and other idiot-syncrasies in Cape Brunswick

Humor us for a moment as we set the stage for what follows with a little digression into pop psycho-babble.

Some years ago, we had a business associate who was drawn to various ‘self-help’ and ‘self-actualization’ weekend seminars, and he often regaled us with his experiences using pearls of wisdom from those excursions.

This one has always stuck in my mind:

“It’s much easier to ride a horse in the direction it’s going.”

Somehow I think this will come into play as we discuss ‘new directions’ and other au courant terms popping up in local discourse.

As we hope you’re aware, we’re making a conscientious attempt to climb back into our normal rut.  Fits, misfits, and starts and deferrals have been involved, and we think it’s now time to comment on the newest vicissitudes of life here in the richest little town in America. 

We’ve recently been rocked by major news emanating from the seat of our municipal government.  That seat, we needn’t remind you, is about to become another chapter in the town’s demolition tradition, and a new seat will soon take its place, at a cost of $1 million plus for buffing up.  And now you can add $100,000 or so to the effective cost of that move to cover Mr. Manager’s parachute.  And perhaps much more than that, if past is prologue.

But we don’t want to examine this real news before telling you of the lovely holiday experience we had before the end of the year.  We decided, as we usually do, to pay our current year property taxes in full by December 31st.  As we wrote the check, we noticed prior year records, and were delighted to see that our property tax levy has risen nearly 12% in just two years. 

We consoled ourselves with the thought that this was ever so small a price to pay for all the lovely new services and benefits provided to us for that mind-numbing increase.  We encourage you to do the same, and as you do, remind yourself of the hard work put in by our betters to see that the town lives within its means and that of its residents and taxpayers.

Moving on, you must know by now that Town Manager Gary Brown submitted his resignation to the Town Council on December 24th, as reported in this article.  As chance would have it, only days before that news broke, we had seen an article in the Wall Street Journal reporting that the Board of a company we had never heard of had reached an agreement to pay their CEO in excess of $30 million for giving up severance pay:

Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. FCX +1.29% awarded its chief executive officer, Richard Adkerson, shares currently valued at about $36 million to compensate him for agreeing to give up rights to severance pay.

Which made us wonder what it was going to cost us to have Brown ‘resign.’  This goes to the heart of the matter; the departure is one thing, but the ‘management’ double speak surrounding the affair is, to put it mildly, quite another. 

(As an editorial note, we’ve come to believe that the oddly worded rationale for council ‘executive sessions’ in recent months have been dealing with finding a way to get Brown to leave without asking him to resign.  See for example this post.)

Brown’s departure invites all sorts of speculation and related chatter amongst the ruling class and the unwashed, though we don’t know if the invitation was accepted.  Is he a scapegoat for McClellan and Brunswick Development Corporation embarrassments?  Or does it run much deeper?  Now that the council has been reconstituted and the House of Sartoris is back on board with Johnny P and the rest, could it be that Jacquie P is playing a role behind the scenes? 

We don’t think anyone could argue that the council hasn’t become more political in recent years, and the two J.P.’s are as politically driven as any in our aristocracy.  (See this post to refresh yourself on past musings.)  It remains to be seen what we can expect from MS “Where is Pem Schaeffer?”

                 

When you come right down to it, the text book rhetoric associated with such ‘transitions’ is an embarrassing example of ‘polite’ mis-characterization of reality, and insults the intelligence of those governed by the parties involved.  Let’s look at a few examples:

  • “I wasn’t asked to resign.” 
  • And this by Suzan Wilson: "As a result, we began discussions with (Brown) regarding the future direction of the town and have arrived at an agreement that works for both the town and (Brown)"

Oh what fun we could have with these; they only exclude one of ten or more ‘suggestions’ the council might have made to Mr. Manager.  Possibilities are endless, comprising variations on the theme of ‘we’re not asking you to resign, but if you don’t…..’ 

Or, ‘if you want to leave with a good reference and an unblemished public record…..’  Or, ‘If you decide it’s the right time to seek other opportunities, we’ll give you the sum of …..’  Or, ‘have you thought about the consequences of digging your heels in….’  Or, ‘we don’t have to tell you how this works; either you choose to …….’  Or, ‘it’s not you, it’s us……’  Or, ‘ you have a very bright future ahead of you, somewhere else….’

Even The Ostrich couldn’t swallow the rock it dug out of it’s hole in the sand. 

You help us with the transition, Gary, and don’t sue us, and we’ll be nice and pay you a lot of taxpayer money to leave early. No one will say anything about why — ever — under pain of legal action.

Incredulous over the need to bribe Brown with somewhere between 6 months and a year of pay and benefits and the promise of a glowing recommendation to leave, does anyone in their right mind really expect us to believe he wasn’t ‘asked to resign’ by some means or another?  Oh wait…..’right minds’ aren’t relevant here.

  • a desire for a ‘new direction for the council’ and ‘seek the direction that they want to take this community’

Using the term ‘new direction’ suggests that there was an ‘old direction.’  We’re often slow on the uptake, but we’ve never been able to discern any coherent ‘direction’ on the part of our town council, unless these examples exemplify ‘direction:’

  • Accepting whatever is proposed in the budget, except for some showboat tinkering, and setting the tax rate high enough to provide the revenue to pay for it.
  • Swallowing whole the latest in ‘advances’ offered up by the parasitic consultancy, like back in parking, raised crosswalks, passenger rail revival, etc.
  • Sucking up to the School Department with suggestions that $50 thousand or so be eliminated before approving, with tearful commentary, the latest in ‘for the children’ spending increases.   Not to mention really ‘tough decisions.’
  • Assuming that every taxpayer can handle the tax increases as if they were pocket change, encouraged by the occasional advice to ‘tell people who don’t like the increases to move somewhere else.’
  • In other words, holding on for dear life instead of leading the town to a position of living within its means, like the rest of us are obligated to do.

Or as you might now have figured out, riding the horse in the direction it’s going, rather than leading it where you want it to go.  In an age where chief executives are actually willing to say things like ‘leading from behind,’ should we be surprised?  What’s next…leading from beneath?

Even more amusing is the reaction of some councilors to the mention of seeking a new direction, as cited in this article.

But statements by Councilors Benet Pols, John Perreault, Millett and Walker suggest the new council isn't moving in lockstep.  "There's no consensus that there is a particular direction," Pols, one of the two at-large councilors, said, adding that "a new direction" was Wilson's phrasing.

Perreault, of District 4, echoed Pols remarks.  "I don't know where (Wilson) came up with that wording," he said. "I would certainly ask what she meant by her words. It's not like we sat as a council and said we want to go in that direction."

Millett, of District 6, and Walker, of District 2, said they were surprised by Brown's resignation.

"I was not included in any of the conversations at all," Millett said.

Walker added: "I, too, was surprised by (Brown's) announcement."

The two new councilors also said they were confused by Wilson's "new direction" statement, given that they had no input on Brown's resignation.

"I don't know what she's specifically referring to," Millett said, though she added it's possible it could be related her and Walker's arrivals.

Walker said he was "frustrated," "annoyed" and "disappointed" that Wilson used the phrase, making it seem as if the previous council was trying to "cast aspersions" on the new one.

"The decision should have been owned by the outgoing council, instead of pinning it on the new council," he said.

As you can see, the council clearly begins the new session with a unity of purpose and comity that would make even the most cynical proud.  Of what, you might ask, and when we figure that out, we’ll get back to you.  Because we may decide to take this media outlet in a new direction.  Or we might decide to have no direction at all, because having direction is like having purpose; it can be so confining and constraining, in the psychobabble sense.

We do, however,  have some suggestions on new directions for the council and the community, many of which we’ve submitted to prior town councils.  Here are just a few:

Some thoughts on new directions:

  • The town council takes control of the town budget, rather than allowing the budget to take control of them.  As history proves, you can govern, or you can spend.
  • The town council lays down NTE figures for both the School Department and Municipal functions.
  • The town council lays out a minimum five year plan for total expenditures and tax rates.
  • The town council mandates that both the municipal and school department sides implement a restructuring of employee benefits, in particular the health insurance.  It’s time for employees to pay a far greater share of their benefits as has happened everywhere in the private sector.  Taxpayers should not be expected to absorb whatever increases in costs come along while employees are immune to them.  This would be one way to reduce the automatic upward pressure on budgets and taxes.
  • The “Town Manager” is redesignated as the “Town Administrator,” though this will probably be nearly impossible due to Charter and Statutory considerations.
  • The “Town Manager” is relocated to a seat at either end of the Town Council horseshoe table, or the front row of general seating, or a separate small table, instead of seating in an implied position of parity with the Town Council Chair.  It needs to be understood by all concerned that he/she is an employee of the Town and the Town Council.  He/she is employed to run the day to day operations of town apparatus; the Town Council is elected to govern the town.

We’ve puzzled over a metaphor for ‘directions,’ and for the moment, we’ll go with weathervanes, of which there are many types.  Working properly, they show which way the wind is blowing with respect to fixed compass points.

Here are some examples that might make sense for the town’s ‘new directions:’

  • Crazy like a fox, to honor the role of Johnny Protocols and unnamed others, past and present, in town governance

            

  • Another day, another spending increase

                   

  • Just a spoon full of sugar makes the tax increases go down

                  

  • Look over there, a cow is jumping over the moon; should we follow it?

                  

  • New directions?  We got your ‘new direction’ right here!

              

  • Brunswick Dragons rule!

             

  • Chim-chimanee, chim-chimanee, chim-chim-cheree; sing along with us children as we pass yet another increase in school spending to make the mommy mafia happy!

            

  • The creative economy rules, and come to think of it, creative explanations for going in wrong directions

             

  • On the other hand, let’s go this way; is there any more space at the base for a new aviation innovator?

          

  • Although howling at the moon might achieve more success while reducing required building demolitions

                  

As a final thought related to ‘directions,’ we’re reminded of a candidate for national office several years back who was described by a member of the chattering class as a “3 mph windsock.”  It remains to be seen which way the winds will blow here in the Cape, who will align themselves with the breeze, and who won’t.

And we should note that windbags and windsocks are not the same thing, in case you wondered.

Oh, and one more thing.  We hope the council can find it in their collective mind to come up with actually meaningful questions to ask new managerial candidates, beyond things like ‘can you hear well enough to answer the telephone?’  And can you read?

Bowdoin: Ground zero for economic justice…

File this report under “Bowdoin’s commitment to sending out students committed to social and economic justice.”

Paula Volent, senior vice president for investments, remained Bowdoin’s highest-paid employee during the 2011 calendar year, a position she has held since she bypassed President Barry Mills in the 2007 fiscal year according to a November 2008 Orient article. She earned $873,686 in total in 2011,

At $499,824, Mills’ earnings ranked third, behind Volent and William Torrey, who stepped down as senior vice president for planning and development in 2011. Torrey made $552,311, a 78.5 percent increase—from $309,333 the year before—that Mills attributed to a retirement package.

We had hoped to post the visual here, but that wasn’t possible.  So you’ll have to go to the article itself.  And for you data junkies, the article provides this link to the source document:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/201856475/Bowdoin-2011-Form-990

Volent, the article points out, is responsible for managing Bowdoin’s Billion Dollar endowment.  So we doubt you’ll find this poster hanging in her office, which we recall, may actually be in New York….

         

You know what they say: ‘one person’s poverty and suffering is another person’s college endowment.’

In the same issue of The Orient, you’ll find this item, juxtaposed to the above:

http://bowdoinorient.com/article/8867

Be sure to read the comments on this one!  The immediate impression is that in Bowdoin’s ‘sphere of influence,’ there is more than one ‘world view.’  As we’ve written before, Bowdoin would not be the place it is without the benefit of great personal fortunes, most, if not all, made on Wall Street and in other forms of greedy capitalism.

                    

And we sure hope the highly paid appreciate the fact that the town of Brunswick lets the college off the hook on what would otherwise be monumentally large property taxes.

We wonder how much ‘inner conflict’ there is at the Ivory Tower over such cognitive dissonance.  Perhaps a course should be created to cover such duplicity.                

             

New directions: Pols unplugged?

Nearly a week ago in this post we wrote this:

- Based on our personal experience, and that of everyone else we’re familiar with, we doubt Michelle will get any sort of response.  And the same thing would happen if she spoke on the subject live in front of the council.

New Council Chair Benet Pols made reference to these words in a message he sent us (above citation edited out) with a subject line of ‘FW: oh ye of little faith’:

about Michelle Small's letter to the counci. You posted it two days before we even receieved Michelle's email. Emails sent to the "town council" go to the administrative assistant and are forwarded to us. Whatever caem in over night gets sent to us in the morning, (However, emails to an individual town councilor go directly to that councilor's inbox whenever they're sent). We got Michelle' letter Tuesday after MLK day about 8:00 AM. I answered her about an hour later.

MIchelle must have written her letter over the weekend.

I guess she thought her letter deserved an audience from unconventional new outlets and so sent it to you before we saw it.

Emails to the TC are automatically copied to conventional news outlets at the same time they're sent to us....that is, if the conventional news outlet has asked to be on the distribution list. Mistler and Brogan started this deal back in the day. I know Emily Guerin and Darren Fishell did it too. Not sure if the current crop of reporters have followed suit or not.

I imagine if you asked, you too could get a copy of every single email that gets sent to the town council.

In any event below is what I wrote to Michelle.....enjoy.

"We did read it. News coverage of the selection process makes clear the issue of the grievance was discussed. It was the reason I asked, and the rest of the council agreed, to defer nomination from the first meeting so that we could discuss it fully and so that new councilors would have a chance to participate.

Later in the week we set a special meeting for the choice of council issue. I spoke with the local reporters and directed them to the Board of Overseers reprimand. I told Dylan Martin about it when he was covering the council retreat on Saturday asking about other things. I called JT Leonard from the TR about it on Monday to be sure he'd be there too. Dylan had more time with the information and was able to call Mr. Langsdorf before the meeting.

With respect to fees, each of the other firms interviewed proposed only an hourly rate---Preti Flaherty also proposed an hourly rate, but included two hybrid hourly/monthly retainer proposals. The three fee structures were outlined in their proposal. It included their analysis of the previous ten months of billing and what each of their proposals might have saved us, at least on their reading of the our billing history.

Faced, for the first time in my years on the council, with a choice (emphasis ours), we decided to explore the two hybrid fee structures more carefully and consult with folks in other towns who use the hybrid models. If neither of them works for the majority of the council we can always choose the default hourly rate option (just a shade under what we've been getting from Bernstein). I've spoken with a City Councilor from Augusta on billing (also discussed the reprimand) and John Eldridge is doing a little deeper work with the bills. We expect to make a recommendation to the council tonight.

Benet"

And we replied with this:

Chairman Pols:

Thanks for your response, perhaps an all time first, though I would have to really check the memory banks to verify that.
I have for years been getting automated replies to submitted emails telling me that they would be forwarded to councilors and the TR at least.  In this electronic age, I assumed that happened automatically, and that the primary goal, at least for some period, was to mask councilor email addresses with a 'joint' town council address.

Just for grins, I had one councilor block my address, so incendiary and threatening were my messages in the past.  I assumed, perhaps wrongly, that the 'group address' prevented this from happening.

That said, in my long and sordid history writing to and 'testifying' before the council, I cannot recall a single email in actual response.  And the only live responses I can recall from the 'floor' were being called "out of order;" being called "inflammatory;" being called "delusional;" and being called 'a teller of fictions.'  Interesting anecdotes associated with each, if you ever wanted to have a cup of coffee and tell sea stories.

If you think these are seared in my memory, you are correct.  There has been very little competition for the space they reside in.

So I take your response, whatever spirit it was sent in, as a refreshing change.  And until I hear or find otherwise, I'll take it in the spirit of camaraderie.

It seems, as it often does, that a few observations are in order.

- We’ll never know, we suppose, whether Pols’ would have responded to Michelle absent our post or not.  But for now, we’ll give him a good faith gold star and assume that he would have.

- We appreciate his offer to ask that every email coming into the town council be forwarded to us.  We won’t be taking up that offer at the moment, though it could amount to expanding our roster of ‘field correspondents’ by leaps and bounds.

- We wonder if the press should ask, in addition, to be copied on all emails emanating from councilors and the town manager, since they are all part of the public record.  Who knows what unexpected delights they might reveal.  We’ll have to give that some more thought.

- Pols once publicly called us a ‘blogger extraordinaire,’ which we found both a-musing and be-musing.  (try as we might, we didn’t find a dictionary entry for ce-musing.)  Now it appears he’s re-labeled us an ‘unconventional new (sic) outlet,’  As contrasted to ‘conventional news outlets,’ in which he seems to be referring to The Ostrich, The Forecaster, and a few others.

- We wonder whether we should take Pols’ response to Michelle as a tacit indication that all ‘serious’ memos to the council will from this point on be responded to in a timely fashion, or as we wondered earlier, this was an unusual case spurred by an ‘unconventional’ report. 

      

- You can help clarify this by submitting an email with your concerns to “towncouncil@brunswickme.org,” and telling us of any response (or lack thereof) you receive.  Or, if you wish to address the grand high poobah himself, you can write to “EBPols@brunswickme.org.”

- We expect to test the hypothesis before long, and will report on what we discover.  We’re thinking a message asking whether due diligence on the McClellan Building discovered any reports of sinking or other instabilities or architectural anomalies, and if so, how they have been dealt with.  We’ll have to decide whether we publish any such memo here at the same time we forward it to the council.  You know, Marquess of Queensberry rules and all that folderol.

                  

The mention of whom can’t help but make us wonder whether there is such a thing as a Queens-berry pie.

(Note to Chair Pols: please don’t show up for the next council meeting in a red cardigan and polka dot shirt.  There’s already enough resemblance, and we don’t need anyone in the audience getting a case of the vapors.  Oh, and we’re glad you finally got a choice on the council; it’s about time.)

Thursday, January 23, 2014

‘Mr. Manager,’ full circles, and good ole’ boys

Just a quick observation on the circumstances pertaining to the ‘time of transition’ here in Cape Brunswick, and how things that go around have a strange way of coming around.  (For some reason, the item we’re about to report on reminds us of the Brunswick Taxi story.)

And makes our recent coverage of the McClellan and TRS as a local phenomenon seem all the more relevant.

  

Here it is, as reported in this story.

Earlier in Tuesday's meeting, the council scheduled a workshop for Feb. 10 to kick-start its search for a new town manager and to discuss the proposed construction of a connector road at Cook's Corner.

During the workshop, the council will discuss any desired changes to the town manager's job description. The council will also review proposals expected to come from two consultants interested in helping with the town manager search.

Chairman Benet Pols said the two interested parties are former Town Manager Don Gerrish, who now works as a consultant for law firm Eaton Peabody and will begin serving as Wiscasset's interim town manager next month, and Municipal Resources Inc., which assisted the town with its previous town manager search.

We won’t elaborate on the ‘kick-start’ imagery; it might be too hard to control our imagination.  And we have a hunch there may be a lot more to the connector road than meets the eye, but that will have to wait.

But we do want to comment on the ‘desired changes to the town manager’s job description.’  We’ll have more to say on this in a post we’re struggling to complete, but for now, we certainly hope that the job description is revised to elevate it above this citation in an earlier post:

ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS of the Town Manager:

Ability to see well enough to do job requirements.

Ability to read, speak, and write in English.

Ability to hear well enough to do job requirements.

Ability to learn at fast rate.

Strong knowledge of English language and how to communicate using it.

Ability to work independently.

Ability to supervise.

Ability to hear well enough to use phone.

Ability to handle mentally and emotionally disruptive or disquieting influences.

Ability to arrange or deal with tasks in order of importance.

The more we read through these, the more we see these ‘essential functions’ as a farce.  You could use most of them to describe what you expect of a fifth grader, for crying out loud.

But it really doesn’t matter, because such documents exist only to placate the unwashed.  We’ll do what we will do, independent of any guidelines and requirements in the ‘public record.’

As to the offer from former Manager Don Gerrish and Eaton Peabody, wow!  Talk about the good ole boy network!  The Eaton Peabody consulting division is headed by Matt Eddy, former Economic Development Director on the Brunswick town staff, hired by Gerrish, we think.  And the outgoing Mr. Manager was brought in by Gerrish as well.  Don’t forget that Gerrish is the reason we can talk about TRS.  He ‘shepherded’ the town through that winter of our discontent as memory serves.  And he also ignored the requirement in his job description to submit a CIP with the budget for many years, until a local resident raised the issue publicly.

We raised a concern the other day about the contrived letter of reference terms typically embodied in separation agreements of the sort that apply here.  They pretty much say that no matter how badly you screwed up, we’ll give you a glowing letter of recommendation if you’ll just get the hell out of here and not sue us.  We shouldn’t have to tell you what a mistake this can be; recent history is very clear on just how disastrous the consequences often are.

Given Gerrish’s lifelong career in the Mr. Manager business, we have serious doubts whether he will or can cut through the Brunswick Sausage of typical references in making recommendations to the town council for a new hire.  Objectivity and detachment are the last things we should expect in these circumstances, especially in view of the particulars.

We don’t know poo about Municipal Resources, Inc, but we’re guessing they don’t make a good living by pointing out that at least half of those they consider recommending are under-achievers or worse who can’t hold a job.

But that’s just us.  We’re a bit choosy, as you know.  It’s why you come back to see what we have to say.  We’re not afraid to say what others are afraid to tell you.  It doesn’t make any difference, but at least you get to think about it.

And maybe, just maybe, every now and then somebody in a position of power squirms just a little bit.

Technorati Tags: ,

On Bowdoin: Major Upcoming Event in Brunswick

Last year we posted these two items (among others) on the study from the NAS that focused on ‘what Bowdoin College teaches.’

http://othersideofbrunswick.blogspot.com/2013/04/bowdoin-diversityyah-shurr.html

http://othersideofbrunswick.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-bowdoin-project-report-very-quick.html

The reaction on the Bowdoin campus among faculty, administration, and student body was illuminating, but didn’t really have ‘legs.’

A significant follow up event has been scheduled right here in Brunswick, featuring noted scholars who will take the discussion to the next level.  We expect some on the campus will consider this to be an unwarranted and hostile forum, and their complaints about ‘academic freedom’ will be duly noted. 

We’re reminded of this pearl of wisdom:

“Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.”
  - William F. Buckley, Jr.

We plan on attending, and we hope you will consider doing so as well.  Here are the details:

http://www.mainepolicy.org/event/3238/

Thursday, February 6, 2014 in Brunswick

Luncheon
● 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. ●

Panel Discussion
● 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. ●

Inn at Brunswick Station
4 Noble Street

Global Illusions

Bowdoin’s Post-Citizens and the Future of American Higher Education

Dr. Herbert London
President Emeritus
Hudson Institute

Panel Discussion
Dr. KC Johnson
Professor
City University of New York

Dr. Michael Poliakoff
Vice President of Policy
American Council of Trustees and Alumni

Dr. Peter Wood
President
National Association of Scholars

Please join us for an in-depth presentation and discussion about the recent report, What Does Bowdoin Teach? How A Contemporary Liberal arts College Shapes Students. Dr. Herbert London, Dr. Peter Wood, Dr. KC Johnson, and Dr. Michael Poliakoff will discuss how higher education has transformed from strong intellectual traditions, a core curriculum, and a commitment to Western Civilization, to a new focus on race, class, gender, and the environment. Out went the old style of scholarly generalists as teachers, and in came the new style of research specialists as faculty members. The new Bowdoin dedicated itself to the achievement of social justice and to reshaping America in the image of progressive politics.

Luncheon and Panel Discussion Ticket: $35

For additional information, please contact Kate Clark

by phone at 207-321-2550 or by e-mail at kclark@mainepolicy.org.

Technorati Tags: ,

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

McClellan: Making new memories for Cape Brunswick?

The other day, in this post, we coined the term “TRS” as shorthand for Times Record Syndrome.  Along the same axis, we just realized that the terms ‘due diligence’ and ‘due negligence’ have a lot in common, especially as they relate to municipal acquisition of existing properties.  Properties, as Sally Sellitt might describe them in classic real estate ad hyperbole, ‘just waiting for your creative and loving touches to bring out their inner strengths and restore them to their full glory.’

Speaking of TRS, do you know of a living person anywhere else who can say they watched their town tear down TWO generations of Town Hall?  Or, if you’re of a mind to give some credit for the SNAFU involving the old Times Record building on Industry Road, for which we created the diagnosis of Times Record Syndrome (TRS), we could give some credit for that false start, and change the premise of the question to tearing down 2.5 generations of Town Hall. 

That was $2 million or so down the crapper, and it deserves some sort of recognition in our rich and varied history.  And it bridges the current ‘town administration’ with the prior one.

Here’s the old Maine Street Town Building, which we understand was torn down in the 60s.  That’s before we arrived on the scene, but we were of adult age then, fresh out of college with our engineering degree.

File:Old Town Building, Brunswick, ME.jpg

We had a hard time finding a pastable photo of the about to be demolished building on Federal Street, but with a little luck, this link will remind you of that exquisite tribute to civic pride and public building architecture.  We will miss it so.

Now our lovely and perfect town is about to embark on the McClellan phase of its distinguished capital asset history.  We’ve written on the subject several times in the past.  The more we learn, the more we’re convinced there must be a lot of high-fiving in Bowdoin College executive offices over the ‘deal’ they negotiated with the town. It’s looking more and more like they got rid of a lame white elephant that was completely out of character with their normal building aesthetic.

We don’t know whether the process that unfolded when planning to adapt the building for town use, which begun in the $100,000 range, led to Mr. Manager’s ‘resignation.’  It easily could have provided sufficient impetus for any councilors who were so inclined to begin with. 

In such situations, we’re always reminded that we should have had professional staff handle such complex development efforts.  Oh wait; we do have professional staff.  Some times it’s hard to tell when it comes to our physical assets, if not a number of other things.

To refresh you as to the current status of things, we only need look at this article from last year.  It reports, more than a month ago, that estimates for the renovations have increased to $992,000, but who knows what unknowns could have popped up between then and now.  On a drive by the other day, it was pretty clear that work was well underway on the first floor at least, with two full size dumpsters on site.

This aged article points out that the $992,000 figure was already obsolete.  Why?  Because of a ‘bidding form mistake, the cost of a $90,000 power generator wasn’t in the budget.’  That’s the adult equivalent of ‘the dog ate my homework.’  Ka-ching, ka-ching. 

Make the new, revised, 2014 total $1,082,000.  By the way, $90,000 could buy 15 or so whole house standby generators, in case you wondered.  Later in the same article we read this:

In addition, the replacement and repair of rotting wood on the building's sides also won't be addressed until one of the next two fiscal years, Brown said, although he did not provide a cost estimate.

As most of us who own property know all too well, putting off replacement and repair of ‘rotting wood’ for a year or two always reduces the overall scope of the job and lowers the cost.  At least we’ve come to believe that’s what it says in the “Manual of Deferred Municipal Building Maintenance.”  We’re guessing $50,000 as the right range.

Ka-ching, ka-ching again, faithful readers.

Now the really good news on McClellan.  It’s come to our attention that the building has some other problems that are not public knowledge, and that these may well be caused by ‘underlying’ factors that could lead to serious issues and expenses in coming years.  These might be of the sort that are not easily deferred, and whose scope and costs are not easily predicted.

Here are the inputs we’ve received, from more than one source:

A shear problem of the sewer line into the building caused by building and or surrounding soil shifting. That line was apparently not fitted with the required flex connection boot. It is an indication of dynamics that were not accounted for in the past.

Numerous problems, none seriously substantiated, relating to sinking, settling, and drainage.  Reports that the bathrooms on the first level have a "sunken" floor.  Serious problems with drainage that will only get worse with time.

Drainage problems coupled with high groundwater and sloppy saturated soils will combine over time to cause incremental foundation problems that will likely go undetected until "discovered".  Stabilization is not now in the budget and should be evaluated by a qualified geotechnical - structural - foundation consultant. Truly a hidden cost; likely long term problem.

While we have no documentation to submit on these issues, given the history and nature of the site, they don’t come as any real surprise.  That aside, shouldn’t due diligence require that inquiries into past problems be made, and that the underlying causes and possible consequences be identified?  Who knows what we’re getting into, and what we’ve allowed Bowdoin to get out of?  On the other hand, it’s too late.  The deal is done.  TRS.

In case you’ve forgotten, one of the justifications for replacing existing schools in town is ‘sinking floors.’  So such problems are not unknown in the area.  Even the new Police HQ building underwent some setbacks and additional expense because of groundwater issues.

We’re reminded of a Sunday School song from decades ago about ‘houses built on sinking sands.’  We’re also reminded that the Brunswick West site where NNEPRA wants to build the Amtrak MLF suffers from similar ‘soil dynamics’ challenges, and that these are adding substantially to the projected cost and complexity of that project.

Uncertainty, unknowns, lack of due diligence, risk?  It’s beginning to look like TRS may be contagious.  Be sure to wear appropriate protective gear the next time you dig a hole.

Or, for those who suggest ‘don’t worry, be happy,’ perhaps they can start building the legend of Cape Brunswick’s own modern-day tourism icon. 

Don’t be surprised If you start hearing that all meetings will be held on one side of the building.