Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Brunswick – The Musical; is MSMT paying attention?

Have you seen Chicago – The Musical?

                                       

You really should.  It’s been produced on Broadway multiple times; at MSMT here in town; and the Merrill in Portland hosted a touring company version several years ago.  It’s also been made into a movie; we own both that and the CD.  It’s a lively show, with great music and dance numbers, and unforgettable characters, including a slick lawyer, two foxy ladies, and a matron who oversees the inmates.  As the lyrics reveal, ‘tit for tat’ is part of the story line.

The opening words of the show come from an offstage announcer, who says this:

                                             

While we’re neither a musician, an actor, a composer, or dancer, we do love musicals, and have been going to them for a good 50 years or so.  So we occasionally go off on a tangent with lame-brained ideas for shows and tunes.  Last night, after attending the town council meeting, the muse came knocking, and gave us an idea for “Brunswick - The Musical.”

We’ve already got a working draft for the intro that reads like this:

“Ladies and gentlemen!  You are about to see a story of carbon footprint, diesel fumes, foul smells, bad vibrations, moral hazards, greed, corruption, exploitation, and treachery.  All the things we hold near and dear to our hearts.”

Adapting the music and casting are two of our biggest challenges, and we’re hoping some collaborators will step up to help.  Maybe a friend or two from MSMT staff would like to get involved.  We’d gladly give them first rights to debut the finished work when it’s ready for a tryout.  They can help with auditions and all the other nitty-gritty details.

Herewith some ideas for musical numbers:

All That Noise (based on All That Jazz)

Funny Money (based on Funny Honey); the words alone suggest who should perform this number, but we’ll let the pros decide.  Here’s how we see the first few lines:

      Sometimes I’m right, sometimes I’m wrong.

      But he doesn’t care, he’ll string along.

Rail Block Tango (based on Cell Block Tango); we see this as being performed by the Schadenfreude Six, consisting of Wayne Davis, his acolytes Jeff Reynolds and Jim Trusiani, and others who have successful auditions.  Susan Wilson, other councilors, and former councilors are expected to vie for the roles.  The opening words will go like this:

      They had it coming, they had it coming.

      They only had themselves to blame.

When You’re Good to Mama: this number is so ripe for adaptation and casting that we’re considering a number of obvious options.  The theme is:

      Got a little motto, always sees me through.

      When you’re good to Mama, Mama’s good to you.

Razzle Dazzle; one of our favorites, and a real show stopper, sung by Billy Flynn, the attorney in the show.  The words almost need no change, and we do have a leading prospect for the role, but we’ll have to see how good he is in the audition with the pink feather fans and the leggy dancers.  Check these words:

      Give ‘em the old flim flam flummox, fool and fracture ‘em

      How can they hear the truth above the roar?

All I Care About; this is another Billy Flynn show-stopper, with words like these:

     I don’t care about expensive things, cashmere coats, diamond rings

     Don’t mean a thing

     All I care about is love; that’s what I’m here for

Cash (based on Class), which opens with these lines in our imagination:

    Whatever happened to fair dealing, and pure ethics and nice manners?

    Why is it everyone now is a pain in the ash?

    Whatever happened to cash?

I Can’t Do It Alone; we see this as being performed by the two blonde headliners, who ever they turn out to be.  They’ll have to be fast on their feet, of course, and as the old saying goes, ‘always one step ahead of the sheriff.’

================================================================

Oh alright.  Enough of our stupid theatrics.  Besides, the muse just walked out the door; she only works half days.  The problem is we never know which days she’ll work half of.

Let’s get down to the business of reporting.  All the action related to the MLF and the Governor’s letter and the letter to the council took place in the first 45 minutes of the meeting.  And there were some ‘theatrical’ moments, if you don’t mind us saying.

Hyperventilation:

                                              

One speaker, Jeff Reynolds, who we believe to be a NNEPRA groupie and devoted protégé of Wayne Davis, Chairman of Train Riders Northeast, asserted that the Bouchard Drive neighborhood coalition (Brunswick West NC) is a hyperventilating cabal of train haters.  Wayne was in attendance, but left the excessive respiration to others this time around.

                                                      

Reynolds then proceeded to hyperventilate himself, and hyperbolize on broader subjects, like the end of railroads, Amtrak, New England, Maine, the mid-coast and Brunswick, and who knows what else, since he seemed to consider any petitioning to authorities as anarchistic, scorched earth politics gone mad.  He did have a neighbor who agreed with his lunatic doomsday scenario,  curiously enough.

                                  

Jim Trusiani joined the hyperventilation bandwagon as well, though we couldn’t actually discern what he was hyperventilating about.  Maybe he and Jeff should spend a few hours inhaling Downeaster fumes so the oxygen overload subsides.

Schadenfreude;

We mentioned schadenfreude earlier while describing one of our song concepts for the new musical.  It was on display last night, and has been on display in the past at other meetings, and in other conversations and published material.

We can’t remember who triggered the concept last night; but he made a comment something like “I don’t feel any empathy for folks who bought a house next to railroad tracks, and are now complaining because trains use the tracks.”  Snickers were heard here and there in the council chambers as a result.

Any way you slice the sausage, taking delight in other’s misfortune is uncharitable, and rather unseemly in a perfect village like Cape Brunswick, where ‘community’ is a core value.  The implication, of course, is that anyone who moved next to railroad tracks should have known that a 600 ft wide, 40 ft tall industrial facility would eventually be built over the tracks.  (Reminder: commercial and industrial are not the same thing.)

The dismissiveness is bizarre on its face.  These folks have lived with trains passing by for years, and never raised a voice, as best we can tell.  We ourselves had an office that faced directly at these tracks, and was closer than any home on Bouchard, for 6 years, and were always happy to see a real train go by.  Let’s be clear; this is not the same as having an idling 4,250 hp engine park outside your window for 5 hours, where you can smell, feel, and hear it for the duration.

BTW, we’d like to ask why the MLF building isn’t being built over the MLF track area in Portland, where all the logistical and maintenance support already exists.  If the work is already being done there, building a shed over the track area shouldn’t change the environmentals, right?  And it’s not in a residential area, is it?

The comment made was akin to suggesting that if you moved near a gas station, you shouldn’t be surprised or unhappy if a refinery was planned for the site.  Or that if you purchased a home ‘on a road,’ you have no right to complain if a huge distribution center is built across the street, with diesel powered 18 wheelers coming in and out 24/7/365.  How many of you would respond to that with a shrug, saying “I should have known,” and that “it’s all for the greater economic benefit of Brunswick.”  Think back to some of the industrial park expansion proposals put forth in recent years, and the reactions they got from those in the vicinity.

Now let’s add zoning into the mix.  The neighborhood had a right, as we see it, to expect that Brunswick’s zoning ordnances would give them some level of protection from inappropriate use, though you can never predict what a Zoning Board of Appeals with stars in their eyes might do.  No matter; turns out the Feds claim to have ‘pre-emption’ authority, meaning they can override local regulations, and do exactly as they wish.

How nice.  When you think about it, how far is that removed from eminent domain action?  Have you read about Kelo and New London and the ridiculous decisions and outcomes there?

Questions for Brunswick’s Elite & Beautiful:

  • Which makes more sense for Brunswick and the earth: using a full sized SUV for personal transportation, or a Prius, a bicycle, or walking?
  • Which makes more sense for Brunswick and the earth: using Ford Crown Vic or Chevy Caprice land cruisers as taxis, or small, highly efficient, LNG powered Ford Transports?
  • Which makes more sense for Brunswick and the earth:  transporting 10-50 people between Brunswick and Portland, or Brunswick and Boston in a 4,250 hp diesel powered transporter on a limited access thorofare, or a 325 hp diesel transporter on a full access thorofare?
  • Which answers to the above ‘send the right message about Brunswick?’

                            

We have our guesses as to how elite and beautiful Brunswick attitude leaders come down on these questions, and we’re pretty sure not a one of them will see the cognitive dissonance in their discordant answers.

Selling Vacuum Cleaners Door to Door & the MLF Siting Decision:

We remember reading years ago that the first rule of being a ‘closer’ in door to door sales (and most other sales encounters) is to get your foot in the door, and then ask which model the customer wants to buy, not whether they want to buy.

                     

Discussing and debating the building of the MLF in Brunswick West is like the Kirby salesman asking you which model you want to order even though you told him you have a perfectly fine vacuum, and you aren’t interested in a new one.  He’s managing to get you playing in his yard with his rules and referees, instead of playing in your yard with your rules and referees.

It’s like asking animal rights zealots whether bears should be baited with Dunkin’ Donuts or Frostys Donuts?  Wait….there’s another choice.

NNEPRA and its advocates act for all the world like building an MLF in the first place, and building it in Brunswick in the second place, are unimpeachable points of view.  The hell they are.  What if green eggs aren’t needed, or any colored eggs for that matter?  And as we suggested earlier, why aren’t they selling green eggs to Portland, where there’s already plenty of bacon to go with them?

                        

Challenging the Experts and the Advocates:

When we’re feeling especially cantankerous and grumpy, we tell ourselves that the whole idea of Amtrak passenger service to Brunswick is a fraud, based on flawed and unsupportable thinking.  Let’s not forget that passenger rail died off for a host of reasons, and those reasons have not been rescinded, any more than horses have stopped pooping in their buggy tracks.

But we’re willing to put ourselves out there with this assertion, and test the waters, so to speak.  Let those to whom it has been revealed enlighten the unwashed here at Side offices.  In the following areas, if you please:

Convenience:  Can anyone make a plausible argument that the Downeaster is more convenient that the Concord Trailways Bus?  Especially when it comes to heading to Boston’s Logan Airport and back?  Or connecting to points further south?  Have you had anyone help you with your bags when boarding or disembarking from Amtrak?  Have you had them drop you at a specific airport terminal, and pick you up there?

Price:  Let the arguments about the Downeaster being cheaper than the bus begin, but make sure you mention what kind of coupons/or nearly free rides for Bowdoin students are being factored into those numbers.  For our money, being able to take the bus directly to the departure terminal at Logan, get your luggage unloaded, and then reverse the process on the return trip make the value proposition a slam dunk.  Not to mention the free wi-fi, bottle of water, and a movie.

      

Value? Are you kidding? By any measure, Amtrak comes in last, reinforcing why passenger rail service died off a long time ago, except for a very few limited situations, like New York City to Washington, D.C.  And even that takes huge subsidies to sustain.

Flexibility:  Compare the ability of The Downeaster to modify its schedule, its routing, or where it stops to that of the bus.  Or to add or delete service quickly in response to changing conditions.  Or to extend its runs further up the coast, or anything else you can think of.  Can The Downeaster pull up just about anywhere in any town?  Can they call crews and tell them to fire up another train set tomorrow morning?  Do buses need multi-million dollar stations and boarding facilities to deal with passengers?  This is so not even close that frankly it angers us to have to think about it and make a case to you.

Overhead Costs:  How much did the stations/platforms in Brunswick and Freeport cost?  How much does it cost to operate and maintain them?  How much does it cost to transport crews back and forth to Portland via Brunswick Taxi vans?  How much does the “Visitors Center”, which is more realistically a “Departure Center,” cost to operate?  How much is being added to the national debt to keep the train running?

                 

Public Subsidies & Economic Viability:

Do we even have to talk about this?

Environmental Footprint:

                                                                                                                              

OK, so which looks like it has the lesser carbon footprint?  We guess we forgot that if you’re a true believer, in the Cape Brunswick sense, the numbers aren’t important, because you just know the train is the right thing to do.

                                     

Economic Benefit:  We challenge anyone to objectively prove that Downeaster service to Brunswick is a net economic gain for the town.  As we’ve said before, we continue to believe that the train is hauling more discretionary dollars out of town to be spent elsewhere, than it is hauling similar dollars into town to be spent here.  We remind you again of the ‘long term parking lot.’

Ask yourself how much a couple or family spends in Portland or Boston when they attend professional sporting events, including the fares.   You’re going to have to get a lot of people coming north to buy Danny’s Dogs to balance that out.

Adding more trains (“five round trips per day”) will just increase the efficiency of taking dollars from Brunswick to provide economic benefit elsewhere.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.  It’s right up there with giving a quarter million dollar grant of public money to a local taxi company owner to boost the town’s economy.

If you think these are great ideas, let us know.  We’ve got a million similarly productive ideas.

“Why We Love Trains:”

This seems like a great time to remind you that underlying the entire Downeaster business case is the romance angle.  And nowhere is it more clearly articulated than in the publication of Train Riders/Northeast.  There are any number of smitten supporters here in Brunswick, but so far, we’ve been unable to find them waxing romantic in print.

Wayne Davis, shown in this picture, is the Chairman of Train Riders/Northeast, as we noted earlier.  As the photo shows, he’s in love with other things besides Downeaster trains.  He and his associates are dependable water-carriers for NNEPRA.

                                    waynespirocucr

We don’t know if that is a ‘selfie,’ but it is a selfie as we see it.

Ten years ago, in this newsletter, Wayne the romantic waxed rhapsodic about ‘why we like trains.’

The article begins right there on page 1, but if you’re too exhausted from what we’ve hit you with in this lengthy post, you can glory in these highlight phrases:

“the sancity of the land; a dialogue in time and space with the landscape.”

they “travel center city to center city.”  Oh yeah?   Check Portland and Boston.

“they are spirited and intelligent”

“the ride is smooth and laid back and infinitely charming”

“what do we not like about trains?  nothing.”

Sounds to us like in the opinion of some, Buddha can assume the form of an Amtrak train set, and bring peace, tranquility, self-enlightenment, and harmony wherever it should go.  As long as it stays on the rails.  And  maybe lighting the lamps from long, long ago too.

If that’s not a detached, objective, well-reasoned assessment of the value proposition for bringing Amtrak to Brunswick, and building the MLF in the Bouchard Drive neighborhood, then nothing is.

Which may be the pithiest thing we’ve written in a very long time, if you stop and think about it.

Conclusion:

So what are we to conclude?  We could chat further about CoJo, GoJo, and all the other factors involved, but it’s probably time to close by saying it with pictures.

            

                              

             

All aboard!  All aboard the B train!  And don’t forget to tell The Shadow to get in touch with us if you run into him; our conviction that something wicked is going on is undiminished, and we wont be happy until we know the who, the what, and the why.

                         

Monday, March 24, 2014

Other Side Alert: Governor LePage Press Release - Letter of Concern to FRA re: MLF Siting

We had the transom open above our front door to let in a little fresh air before the next load of snow arrives, and look what came over it.  Could it be that even the Governor reads Other Side?

No, actually it couldn’t, but we can hope, can’t we?  After all, we don’t charge for electronic subscriptions like some other media outlets we know.

=======================================================================

For Immediate Release: Monday, Mar. 24

Contact: Adrienne Bennett, Press Secretary, (207) 287-2531

Governor LePage asks Federal Railroad Administration for review of MLF site in Brunswick

AUGUSTA – Governor Paul R. LePage has submitted a letter to the Federal Railroad Administration, requesting that FRA review the approval process for the Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority’s proposed maintenance and layover facility (MLF) in Brunswick.

“As Governor, I have made Maine's economy a top priority of my administration,” said Governor LePage. “I am committed to supporting projects that will stimulate economic growth, including the redevelopment of the former Brunswick Naval Air Station, which would benefit directly from alternative MLF siting in East Brunswick.”

The Governor said he has heard numerous concerns from local citizens about the MLF project. “In light of these concerns, I believe this process requires a significant and thorough review that ensures a rational, open, objective and transparent process for MLF siting,” he said.

=================================================================

Technorati Tags: ,,,

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Amtrak MLF: Are Bouchard Drive residents ‘in a fix’ because ‘the fix is in?’

 

(Important note: This subject will be an item for discussion at the town council meeting tomorrow night, Monday, March 24th.  See the agenda here, and note the items under ‘correspondence.’  They read as follows (we expect those involved to speak on the subject:)

Letter from Brunswick West Neighborhood Coalition (received 03/20/2014)

Email from Chris Casey, Brunswick West Neighborhood Coalition (received on 03/19/2014) )

We’ve written again and again about the circumstances surrounding the plans for the Amtrak Maintenance and Layover Facility, currently expected to be built adjacent to the Bouchard Drive in-town neighborhood.  It’ll be a 600 ft plus long building, nearly 40 ft tall, located just steps away from family homes.  (If you want to refresh your memory on our past comments, take a look here: http://othersideofbrunswick.blogspot.com/search?q=amtrak+mlf)

We’ve agonized again and again over the cognitive dissonance on display as the plans are discussed, promoted, and rationalized. 

                            

“An MLF MUST be built.”  Why??

“It MUST be built in Brunswick!”  Why is that??

“It MUST be built at Brunswick West, along Bouchard Drive!”  To which we say, hoist the Brunswick Sausage flag!

                             

“If we don’t build the MLF in Brunswick where we want, Amtrak Downeaster service to Brunswick WILL END!”  So the case for Downeaster service to Brunswick is that weak?

“Brunswick is nothing without Amtrak!”  Wait….I thought we were nothing without Bowdoin College; will somebody please get this straight?  If we’re supposed to believe, shouldn’t we be told WHAT to believe?  Like good little obedient subjects?

                   

Turns out The Ostrich ran an article on the subject on March 7th, the day we left town for a spring break.  You can find it here: http://www.timesrecord.com/news/2014-03-07/Front_Page/Millett_Move_trains_further_out_to_idle.html.  If you read the article critically, you might conclude, as we did, that it could well have been instigated by the Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA), the quasi-state agency behind the Downeaster expansion and the MLF project.  The article, while offering comments from Councilor Jane Millett and resident Charlie Wallace, parrots all the NNEPRA propaganda points, especially in the “MORE” addendum following the reporter’s email contact info.

Former council candidate Alison Harris sent an email to the council following the article’s appearance, and we’ve posted it here:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/213746651/Alison-Harris-letter-to-town-council-on-March-12-2014.  We read it, and were convinced it had the trademarks of a letter ghosted by NNEPRA staff.  So we submitted the following email to the council:

Town Councilors:

I just reviewed an email from Alison Harris to the town council dated Wed, March 12, 2014, titled “Downeaster & Brunswick Layover Facility.”

Several things about this message are troubling, and I'm contacting you to offer comment. I will use a 'bullet-style' format in order to avoid too lengthy a discourse. Before I do, some background.

Last summer, after having personally experienced the noise, vibration, and fumes of the nearby Downeaster as I sat in Charlie Wallace's office building, I contacted my town councilor, who at the time was Council Chair.

It took a full 24 hours for the smell and taste of the fumes in my nose and on my lips to dissipate, even though I had been inside the office, not outside. This experience convinced me it would be useful for the Chair to visit the track area in the presence of a train so she could experience things for herself. I offered the invite, which she turned down, and rather abruptly and summarily. Our conversation ended on that note.

As I understand things, some councilors have recently attempted to add an agenda item proposing a council resolution addressed to the FRA supporting the need for a full blown Environmental Impact Statement prior to MLF construction.

I further understand that the chair has so far blocked such an agenda item, on the basis that there are 'too many other things to deal with.' This puzzles and perturbs me, adding to the long-held suspicion that something deeply wrong is lurking beneath the surface on the entire Amtrak issue. In so many words, something doesn't smell right.

Now to the 'bullet points:'

  • While difficult to prove, the Harris email has all the earmarks of having been ghosted by NNEPRA and funneled to the Council via a convenient Amtrak advocate. I've done a ton of writing in my day, and read lots and lots of letters endorsing candidates, among other things. An instinctive alarm goes off when a letter sounds too contrived and too perfect. Ms. Harris is obviously invested in the mystique of Amtrak service to Brunswick, and is hardly a detached and objective observer on such matters.

  • Harris is a volunteer at the Visitor Center. This facility should be renamed the “Departure Center,” because it surely has a bigger role servicing those who leave the local region for points south, rather than welcoming visitors who leave points south to visit our region. Especially if you take Bowdoin College students and staff into account. Keep in mind that every vehicle in the long term parking lot next to Brooks Farm Supply belongs to someone departing our area, not someone arriving here.

  • A comparison of value offered to travelers by Concord Trailways service, when compared to the Downeaster, would overwhelmingly show that the bus wins hands down. Furthermore, the cost to local, state, and national taxpayers would similarly argue for the bus and against the train. I plan to post a lengthier treatise on this subject soon.

  • Back to the 'doesn't smell right' point. I don't know how well-tuned your sense of smell is, but all things considered, I worry that too much personal and political capital has been invested in Amtrak service by too many in our town.

  • Harris' inference that she bases her position on what she reads in the local paper is troubling. As one who has sparred with local papers for more than a decade, I am more than familiar with their shallow editorial practices and utter lack of investigative reporting skills. Rather than indict Harris on the face of things for buying their story, I take this as tacit evidence that NNEPRA is behind her message to councilors, and perhaps the article itself. Notice particularly the patronizing tone of the first paragraph.

  • Harris makes reference to the EA of September 2013, but fails to note that changes to the MLF design after this document was put on the record corrupt its conclusions. And she neglects to mention that the site selection work she refers to was done years after NNEPRA had made its decision on where to build the MLF.

  • Mention of 'freight traffic' as an imperative for locating an MLF in the Bouchard Drive neighborhood is a specious argument, and comes across as yet another NNEPRA plant.

  • Mention of putting idling engines into 'other unfortunate neighborhood's back yards' is similarly specious and suspect.

  • The euphoric reference to 'five round-trips every day!' ignores ridership realities between Brunswick and points south, and for reasons unknown, seems to suggest that providing more convenient options for area residents to spend their discretionary funds elsewhere profits the town. An objective assessment of train use would surely show that the economic benefits of the service accrue mostly at destinations to the south, at the expense of local establishments.

  • Comments like “I found the discussion of alternative sites on pages 4-10 particularly helpful, as I am sure you did” are particularly gratuitous and revealing.

  • The last paragraph, in which Harris says she hopes “WE” have your support, once “WE” get past delays, etc, etc. are again peculiarly betraying. This memo was not from “WE,” it was from an individual.

  • While the BWNC has employed a media consultant, the comments on the EA dated September 2013 were not submitted through his office. They were submitted through their attorney. This is another indication that the message is not as represented.

  • Since I do not subscribe to the local newspaper, I did not see the referenced article in its original form. However, the version currently posted on the web (http://www.timesrecord.com/news/2014-03-07/Front_Page/Millett_Move_trains_further_out_to_idle.html)  appears to have been amended following the original posting. The amendment looks as if it were written by NNEPRA. Suspicions that the original article may have been instigated by NNEPRA are reasonable, since this would be common 'media relations' tactics for Portland entities.

I hope you will consider these observations as you ponder what to do next about this matter. Clearly, moving forward on the current NNEPRA plan will have irreversibly detrimental effects on hundreds of Brunswick families, while a full Environmental Impact Statement process will ensure that due diligence has been applied before doing so.

I assure you that I am capable of writing memos like this one by myself, and have indeed done so.  Furthermore, I have no direct stake in Downeaster service, MLF location, or other related factors.

I am, rather, a local 'gadfly' (according to some) who takes exception to insults to the public trust, and abuse of the plain facts associated with such matters.

Respectfully,

Pem Schaeffer

====================================================================

As we pondered the MLF and Downeaster assertions raised early in this post, the Ostrich article, and the ensuing email, we had an ‘excuse me!’ moment. 

Why does the train have to spend 5 hours idling in Brunswick to begin with?  Why doesn’t the crew return the 12:35 pm Brunswick arrival to Portland with paying passengers?  The crew has to get down to Portland anyway.  And all the infrastructure for provisioning, fueling, cleaning, etc, already exists there!  Then another crew could bring a train back from Portland for the 5:50 pm Brunswick departure, carrying paying passengers from Portland on the trip.  This would amount to a third round trip per day, if we have our numbers right.

Oh wait…we know why they can’t do that!  If they did, there would be no contract for Brunswick Taxi to haul crews back and forth from Portland in two round trips per day, at what we’ve swagged to yield $4,000 a week in revenue.  Although now that we think of it, a contract for a ‘Taxi to Nowhere’ is not out of the question when you’re the Government and you have ‘associates’ in the right places.  (We’re still waiting for official information from Amtrak, or a correction from the Kings of Brunswick Taxi.  Our breath ran out several months ago, so we’re getting by on giggle gas at the moment.  Go FU!)

Some might argue that the train has to stay and idle in Brunswick because of labor issues with the crews, even though we’re confident they’re paid for the time they spend riding in the comfort of a Brunswick Taxi van.  Or that track ‘slots’ along the right of way won’t allow for these transits.

Poppycock, we say, and as substantiation, we cite NNEPRA’s claims of expanding service to additional round trips, and Ms. Harris’ euphoric reference to ‘five round trips every day,’ each of which speak to the emptiness of any such possible constraints.

We keep looking at what you might call the ‘defining parameters’ of this situation, and each time we do, we come back to the same unavoidable conclusion.

Deep within our self-actualized, instinctive one-ness, when we find ourselves in perfect alignment with the natural order of the cosmos, we can’t get over a lingering hunch that some-one, and more likely multiple some-ones, have much to gain and/or much to lose depending on how things play out. 

When logic and rational thought are nowhere in evidence, personal self-interest almost always turns out to be the driving force.  We’re too respectful of our ‘public servants,’ elected and otherwise, to say “follow the money.”  But you might not be, so have at it.  And don’t forget power and influence, the other addictions known to afflict those who serve us.

On the other hand, loyalties taken to the extreme might be involved, though we can’t pin those down either.  Loyalty sounds like an honorable trait, and is a good thing when it serves the interests of all involved. 

When it involves compromising the general good, and relates only to the self-interests of a few, at the expense of the many, it is a corruption of public service.

At this point in our dissertation, we think it’s time to consider the various parties involved, because we think there are lots of dots that may be connected, and we don’t want to miss any.  We’ll begin with U.S. Senator King, Angus, reputedly a resident of Brunswick. 

Senator Angus King

Turns out NNEPRA was created during King’s years as Maine’s Governor, so it’s entirely possible he sees the Downeaster extension to Brunswick as a legacy issue (especially if his wind-power legacy runs out of hot air.)

While it was established in 1995, before a certain former Speaker arrived in Augusta, King’s tenure as Governor overlapped with the legislative career of said individual for four years.

A Bouchard Drive resident with substantial career background in railroad matters asked the Senator to see that the Federal Railroad Administration was using rigor and due diligence in delineating the environmental consequences of the proposed MLF. 

King responded with a letter you can read here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/213746610/Sen-Angus-King-letter-re-Amtrak-MLF-environmental-process.

In the letter, King wears a white hat, rides the horse of lily-white federal purity, and staunchly defends the integrity of the Washington bureaucracy. 

                                      

It’s like he’s telling McEvoy ‘we’ll have to build the MLF first to find out what effect it has on your neighborhood, away from the fog of controversy.’

King has come a long way since his Pine Tree Legal days when he advocated for the little guy who couldn’t afford thousands of dollars in legal fees.  Now he advocates for spendthrift big government (with unlimited legal resources) against the little guy who can’t afford tens of thousands in legal fees.

Funny how time, money, and power can change a person, isn’t it?  One can only guess how much respect he has for the ethical foundations of the IRS and other federal employers of long-suffering ‘public servants.’

                      

You can make up your own mind, but as we see it in his letter, King doesn’t represent the people, he represents the masters of the people.  And makes sure to protect his legacy, no matter the effect.  Let’s hope a different kind of hoof beats are heard soon.

Guilford Transportation/Pan Am Railways

As we understand things, Guilford sold the 8 acre proposed MLF site at Brunswick West to NNEPRA in 2011, suggesting the MLF was already planned to be built there, even though an Environmental Assessment had not been done.  The EA was issued in September of last year.  You might say that the answer was known before the questions were asked.

As part of that sale, Guilford effectively absolved itself of full responsibility for site remediation, and would love to see NNEPRA build something on the site to end whatever obligations they still have.  Constructing the MLF there, would in effect, allow Guilford to wash their hands of the contamination problem.

NNEPRA

NNEPRA exhibits all the arrogance of autonomy and sanctimony of sovereignty that infected the Maine Turnpike Authority and the Maine State  Housing Authority before they were scrubbed down with a wire brush wielded by newly appointed and determined boards.  Like the latter two agencies, NNEPRA was created by Maine Statute, and is performing a ‘governmental function:’

Title 23: TRANSPORTATION

Part 7: RAILROADS HEADING: PL 1987, C. 141, PT. A, §4 (NEW)

Chapter 621: PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE HEADING: PL 1995, C. 374, §3 (NEW)

Subchapter 2: NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND PASSENGER RAIL AUTHORITY HEADING: PL 1995, C. 374, §3 (NEW)

§8111. Purpose

The Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority, as established by Title 5, section 12004-F, subsection 16, is a body both corporate and politic in the State established for the general purpose of promoting passenger rail service as set forth in subchapter 1. It is declared that the purposes of this chapter are public and that the authority must be regarded as performing a governmental function in carrying out this chapter. [2005, c. 312, §7 (AMD).]

Besides it’s manifest lack of oversight and accountability, what troubles us most about NNEPRA is the makeup of its Board, and how their connections, past affiliations, and loyalties may influence their decision making and rigor in directing and understanding the actions of the Executive Director and her staff.

The Board currently has a vacancy awaiting Augusta action; the six sitting members are shown below, along with our observations on how they could be ‘dots’ that connect into a picture:

Martin Eisenstein, Chairman
Senior Partner, Brann and Isaacson, Lewiston, Maine

Eisentstein has a wide ranging CV, as shown here: http://www.brannlaw.com/info.php?sec=2&pid=28.  While we do not know him, we think its fair to say that he is probably widely known in the Statehouse, and in all likelihood, had frequent dealings with a certain well-known former Speaker of the House (any guesses?)

Dana Connors, Vice Chairman
President, Maine State Chamber of Commerce, Augusta, Maine

A long time habitue’ in the Statehouse, and we have no doubt, a mover and shaker in any number of power circles; surely well acquainted with that same former Speaker.

Matt Jacobson, Treasurer

A primary candidate in the last race for Maine Governor, which may be the only thing he has in common with a former Speaker, though said Speaker wet his bed before actually becoming a candidate on the ballot.  Jacobson actually has professional experience managing railroad operations.

David Bernhardt, Director
Commissioner, Maine Department of Transportation

An Ex-officio member of the board, who has been in the Maine DOT since 1984.  We’re confident that during his many years in Augusta, he of necessity became well acquainted with a certain former Speaker.

John Bubier, Director
City Manager, City of Biddeford, Maine

A man with a varied background in municipal governance, active in the Maine Municipal Association, and with nine years as the ED of The Greater Portland Council of Governments.  You can read about him here.  We think its fair again to assume his background includes working with a certain former Speaker.

Carolann Ouellette, Director
Director, Maine Office of Tourism

An Ex-officio member of the Board, apparently serving as the designee of Department of Economic and Community Development Commissioner George Gervais.  Gervais has been with DECD since 2008, holding a variety of offices before his current post, including Assistant Commissioner and Acting Commissioner.  Since a certain former Speaker was Commissioner from January 2007 until November 2009, we suspect the two are well acquainted, and had a mutually beneficial working relationship.

Ouellette herself has been at the Tourism Office, a part of DECD, since 2007.  So we’re confident that she and a certain former Speaker have a recent personal working relationship.

By now you’re probably asking yourself why we keep pointing out connections to a certain former Speaker, and if you did, good for you.   Be patient; and keep your crayons handy, because there are yet more dots to connect.  We’re just getting to the good part, and more than dots connecting, paths crossing may be more to the point.

We’ve written before about calling a duck a duck, based on the walk and the talk.  You won’t have to wait much longer to see if the dots you connect with your crayon reveal a duck, or even worse, a turkey.

 

Moving along, let’s get to what we call:

The J & J Connection                                             

As residents of Brunswick know, we have our own long standing “J&J” presence in the community.

            

In our working days, we spent a boatload of bucks having them tend to our shirts, both dress and casual (‘medium starch, hangers,’)  These days, they even use delivery vehicles similar to the newly acquired Brunswick Taxi vehicles.

       DSCN0460

We’re hoping J&J didn’t get local taxpayers to buy the vehicles for them, but one never knows, does one?

There is a similar enterprise here in town, one which could be referred to as “Jo & Jo.”  If that sounds cryptic, you’ll have to humor us in our discretion.  Think of this as a puzzler to hold your interest; Shirley, you can figure it out on your own.  (Hint: both their first names begin with the letters Jo.)

Jo and Jo, who we could just as well tag “CoJo” and “GoJo,” have crossed paths in evident ways, and possibly in other ways.

A number of years back, when GoJo was running the DECD, he came before CoJo and the town council to regale them with his personal contacts with no less than a dozen Fortune 500 companies, which he could not reveal because of ‘protocols.’  This was at a time when interest in Base redevelopment was at a high among town officials.

GoJo left his DECD position to run for Governor.  CoJo served as the treasurer for his campaign, which self-destructed because of ‘irregularities’ in the collection of ‘clean-election’ campaign funds.  Ironic, that.

GoJo now holds the council seat previously long held by CoJo.

GoJo and CoJo have both served on the Board of the Brunswick Development Corporation.  Although CoJo had left that position when the quarter million dollar totally forgivable loan was given to Brunswick Taxi, both GoJo and former Mr. Manager voted in favor of the arrangement.  We can’t help but wonder whether GoJo, in his role as an attorney, might have provided any legal services associated with the transaction to the owner of the recipient taxi firm.  Or ‘facilitated’ it in any other way.

We similarly wonder whether anyone well known provided legal services to Brunswick Taxi for negotiating their contract with Amtrak via Crew Transportation Services, and if so, what the fee arrangements might be.  Could it be similar to what an agent gets…a slice of the pie?

We could site other connected dots, like School Board candidacies, etc, but why bother?

Far as we know, Jo & Jo aren’t planning on opening a laundry, even though ‘taking the town to the cleaners’ comes easily to mind.

And lets not forget the Gary Brown Dots

Oh, and before we end our discussion for now, we’re reminded of how the recently departed Mr. Manager sat in the Cable 3 booth at the so called ‘public hearing’ with NNEPRA in September of last year, and personally ordered that the playback of a calibrated sound recording of an idling Amtrak train be spiked.  This was to be part of testimony given by a town resident who is a Professional Engineer with vast environmental credentials.

We’re not sure where the former Mr. M’s dots will fall in the final artwork, but we’re pretty convinced we haven’t heard or seen the last of him in local affairs.  And who knows – maybe the prior Mr. M will turn out to have a few dots in the picture as well.  Wouldn’t that be a hoot?

Looking for The Shadow

We’re pretty sure after all of this that there’s some evil lurking in the hearts and minds of someone’s somewhere, but we don’t know who they are, and what it is.  Hunches and instincts don’t go away easily.  And the gnawing sensation that personal gain and self-interest are significants factor in this affair just won’t go away.

We’re confident that The Shadow knows, though we’ve been unable to reach him or his people.  If any of you have an inside track with The Shadow, how about asking him to give us a shout, or you could act as a messenger for transporting stuff from him to us.  But don’t expect Brunswick Taxi to comp you a ride.  You should plan on riding the train instead, if only figuratively.

We’ll leave you with an extra credit question:  Is it possible to be the Governor of a Municipality in Maine?  We ask because we wonder if someone who once dreamed of being Governor of the entire state, only to have the dream snatched from him by himself, might try to live out that fantasy by effecting the behavior of Governor of Brunswick.

We know; silly question.  But we bet you’re smirking and snickering as you think about it.

You know, maybe it’s time for you to relax and take in a movie.  We understand one in particular is doing quite well in Brunswick.

Let us know what you think of it.  For all we know, they may play a clip or two from it at the town council meeting this Monday night.

Technorati Tags: ,,,

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Looking for Mr. Good-manager

Here we are, back on the beat after a week in points slightly to the south, that being two destinations in New Jersey.  The land of full service gas stations.  By law.

                      

While there to reset our main springs to the overwound position, we came across the agenda packet for this coming Monday’s (March 17, 2014) special council meeting to discuss the search for a new town manager.

                  

You can find the packet here:

http://www.brunswickme.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Agenda-Packet-March-17-2014-special1.pdf

Three consultants will be interviewed by town councilors to select one to engage for a paid contract to help them find a new Mr. Manager.

As we see it, two of those consulting candidates – The Maine Municipal Association, and Eaton-Peabody (in the person of former Brunswick Town Manager Don Gerrish) – are tainted by a lack of objectivity.  When it comes to guiding councilors seeking ‘a new direction’ in selecting a new official who will have the highest possibility of a long and successful tenure here in the richest little town in America, we’re just not buying their story.  Used car salesmen come to mind.

                

Both will no doubt claim they are “all about process, not about individuals.”  Yah, shurrr.  So they’ve got their butts covered.  If we pick a loser, it will because we chose the wrong candidate, not because of their ‘process advice.’

The MMA is probably the leading expert in protecting the interests of failed and sub-standard town managers, and Gerrish brought us the recently departed Mr. Manager.  On that basis alone, they are highly suspect.

While we know Art Boulay personally, we have no professional knowledge of his process and methods, other than to say they don’t carry the same taint as the two mentioned above.

The memo to the council on the subject from the town’s H.R. Manager, Jessica Factor, says she has “prepared questions for your use with each consultant.”  Unfortunately, we could not find those questions anywhere in the packet.

                               

So we have decided to offer a few questions of our own for councilors to use in their interviews with the three consultants.  As you’ve come to expect, we aren’t mincing words.  So here they are:

1)  How will you ensure that we don’t hire someone else’s failed administrator?

2)  How will you ensure that we know the truth, and the whole truth, about each candidate’s career record, including the details of any termination or other problems during their tenure(s) elsewhere?

3)  How will you ensure that we know specifically and truthfully why any candidate who is currently unemployed is in that situation?

4)  How will you ensure that we have a thorough understanding of any candidate’s ability to effectively and robustly manage capital projects, such as construction of new buildings, and renovations of existing buildings?  And to engage in the purchase of or trade for existing properties?

5)  How will you determine that a candidate has a grasp on long range planning and property tax rate growth?

That’s just for starters; feel free to submit your own to us via comments.  We’ll probably include them all in a memo to the council.

                      

Sunday, March 9, 2014

Pigeon Feeding, Cape Brunswick Style

                   

Somebody somewhere once said “feed the pigeons, and you’ll get more pigeons.”  It’s pretty hard to deny the truth of that assertion.  Do it often enough, and you might even find some goats get into the picture.

     

Which brings us to the latest news about the Brunswick Development Corporation.

 

We’re talking, of course, about this recent report in The Forecaster:

BRUNSWICK — When the Brunswick Development Corp. received four funding proposals last month that exceeded the amount of cash it has in the bank, its directors had to take a step back to think about the bigger picture.

After holding a strategic planning session on Monday, BDC's board decided to change how it lends and grants money to nonprofit organizations and businesses, Linda Smith, the town's business development manager said.

From now on, BDC will focus its efforts in two ways: by offering grants to nonprofits for projects that have a community benefit, and by offering small loans to for-profit businesses, but only in tandem with other lending institutions.

BDC's board also unanimously voted to no longer provide grants or loans that could turn into grants to businesses, after a motion was made by Vincent DiCara, a new citizen board member who had offered the BDC advice last year after it lent an unprecedented and controversial loan to a business.

We don’t know Vincent DiCara, but we think we like his thinking.  It seems to us, reactionaries that we are here at Side, that feeding Brunswick pigeons has led to a pigeon feeding frenzy.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Unless, of course, it leads to some pigeons getting fatter than all the other pigeons.

                  

And they can’t get by unless the rest of us feed them.  Most pigeons learn they have to fend for themselves, and find a way to do so.

Other pigeons think they have a higher rank in the pigeon community, and that this accords them greater benefit.  Especially if they’ve had the authority to influence the rate at which pigeon food is extracted from the other bird species in the area.